Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv03235
Petitioner:
Sam Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franco v. Jones
as 5:2016cv00233
Petitioner:
Pedro Carrasco Franco
Respondent:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Franco v. Jones
as 7:2016cv00353
Petitioner:
Pedro Carrasco Franco
Respondent:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Earley et al
as 1:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bryant Earley, Earley Construction Co., Inc., City of Roswell, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones v. William et al
as 4:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Stephens William , Kelly Strong, Robert Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. IN RE: SEIZURE OF: $101,380.00 FROM SAM JONES SEWELL
as 0:2015mc60162
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
IN RE: SEIZURE OF: $101,380.00 FROM SAM JONES SEWELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
Marvin Goodman v. Bill Reed, et al
as 14-15472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEE GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL REED and SAM JONES
Marvin Goodman v. Sam Jones, et al
as 14-14979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEE GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDELL BEAM, Sheriff of Spalding County, SAM JONES, Special Agent for Spalding County, JOHN CORLEY, Special Agent for Spalding County and others
Goodman v. Reed et al
as 3:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dee Goodman
Defendant:
Bill Reed and Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utica National Assurance Company v. Sam Jones Memorial United Methodist Church, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Utica National Assurance Company
Defendant:
Sam Jones Memorial United Methodist Church, Inc., Terry Howren and Patty Howren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
