Cases 31 - 40 of 133
JONES v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06175
Plaintiff:
EDNA JONES
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , BAYVIEW ASSOCIATES , SANFORD SANDELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bertonis v. Arnovitz
as 3:2014cv01806
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Bertonis
Defendant:
Sanford A. Arnovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMBURG & GOLDEN, P.C. v. SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
as 2:2014cv00538
Plaintiff:
HAMBURG & GOLDEN, P.C.
Defendant:
SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANFORD v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SANFORD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 4:2013cv03064
Plaintiff:
Andre Sanford
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv07083
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GUZMAN
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, GARY SANFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GUZMAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00255
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GUZMAN
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, GARY SANFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALEEM et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05854
Plaintiff:
TAUHEEDAH ALEEM , EVELYN ARNETTE-PAYAN , CLARICE BAZILE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEBSTER et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02455
Plaintiff:
RONDA WEBSTER and SANFORD TRENT WEBSTER
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
