Cases 31 - 40 of 818
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Marcus Alexander Murchinson v. City of Sierra Madre et al
as 2:2022cv08099
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alexander Murchinson
Defendant:
City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw, Grant Cadzow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01701
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Susan Shaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaw v. Clandenin
as 5:2022cv06139
Petitioner:
Timothy Shaw
Respondent:
Stephanie Clandenin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Shaw v. Clandenin
as 1:2022cv01291
Petitioner:
Timothy Shaw
Respondent:
Stephanie Clandenin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP et al
as 4:2022cv04664
Plaintiff:
Attorney Horace W Green
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP Retirement Plan For Partners, et al.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Debra Shaw et al v. Thrive Market, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05153
Plaintiff:
Debra Shaw and Diane Varela
Defendant:
Thrive Market, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Anete Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05035
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stephon Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
