Cases 31 - 40 of 869
Harper v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Dylon Radtke, Michelle Haese, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 2:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendrick et al
as 2:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Shelby Wendrick, FPS Eiting and Justin Segerstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eichelberger v. Yardley et al
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Ray Eichelberger
Defendant:
Judge Laurie J Yardley, Bruce J Prenda, Morgan C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. A O Smith Corporation
as 2:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Monique Cummings
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation and A O Smith Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith, James v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Petitioner:
James Alfred Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Kevin A. Carr and Warden Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
