Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Walker v. Peterson et al
as 4:2012cv04078
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shawn Peterson and Brian Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stormo v. City of Sioux Falls et al
as 4:2012cv04057
Plaintiff:
Eric Stormo
Defendant:
City of Sioux Falls , R. Shawn Tornow , Dave Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Duffy v. Brown County Jail
as 4:2012cv04044
Plaintiff:
Shawn A. Duffy
Defendant:
Brown County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Brown County
as 1:2012cv01007
Petitioner:
Shawn A. Duffy
Respondent:
Brown County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duffy v. Brown County
as 1:2011cv01038
Petitioner:
Shawn Duffy
Respondent:
Brown County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cline v. Kenaston
as 5:2011cv05035
Plaintiff:
Shawn Cline
Defendant:
Dennis Kenaston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Red Feather et al v. Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota et al
as 5:2010cv05078
Plaintiff:
Sheris Red Feather and The Estate of Patrick Emery Maurice Red Feather, Jr.
Defendant:
Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota, Shawn D Van Gerpen, MD, Tom Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Native American Council of Tribes et al v. Weber et al
as 4:2009cv04182
Plaintiff:
Native American Council of Tribes, Blaine Brings Plenty, Shawn Garrnett and others
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Timothy Reisch and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Baker et al v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
Cody Baker, Cody Baker, James V. McCoy and others
Defendant:
Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burnette v. USA
as 3:2009cv03024
Petitioner:
Shawn Burnette
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
