Cases 31 - 40 of 1,128
SMITH v. SMALL et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
GARY SMALL, JESSICA RICHARDSON, CASSANDRA POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
STEVEN PITTMAN, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chaidez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Matthew Chaidez, Stephanie Perez, Matthew Chaidez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Odum v. Santerre et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bernard Odum
Defendant:
Matthew Santerre, Steven Ceballos and Steven Olivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Prestopic et al v. Newmar Corporation
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Marla Jo Prestopic and Steven C. Prestopic
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Odum v. Santerre
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Odum
Defendant:
Matthew Santerre, Steven Olivas, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Walton
as 3:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Steven Greer
Defendant:
Arrion Walton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
