Cases 31 - 40 of 78
RAVAN v. TALTON et al
as 5:2019cv00161
Defendant:
DEPUTY HARMON, DEPUTY GARY HEBERLY, DEPUTY CRAIG PEIRCE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN STEPHEN RAVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Deese et al
as 1:2019cv02006
Defendant:
Supervisor James Townsend and Sgt. Willie E. Deese
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Wiley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Mayor Hardy Davis, LPN Teresa Leslie, LPN Alisha Turvey and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Meriwether County, Georgia et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
Amber Ritter, Meriwether County, Georgia, Ms. Lori Chatham and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Trezonza Bobbitt, Harold Caravillio, Harold Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed v. Atlanta Impound et al
as 1:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Ahmed
Defendant:
Atlanta Impound, Chief of Police, C. K. Livsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv05094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lawrence
Defendant:
Taylor, Thomas, Major Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. 1ST Shift SGT. Dead Wiler et al
as 1:2017cv05043
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Octavious Willis
Defendant:
1ST Shift SGT. Dead Wiler, Mental Health Supervisor Dr. Quinn and Mental Health Supervisor/Coodinator Dr. Brick House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv03465
Plaintiff:
Miguel Hernandez Fernandez
Defendant:
R. L. Butch Conway, Don Pinkard, One Unknown Rapid Response Team Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Warden et al
as 1:2016cv04402
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Defendant:
Warden, Associate Warden, Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
