Cases 31 - 40 of 62
SWIFT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02601
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
ROCKY SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SEBOLT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CLINT SWIFT
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Swift v. USA
as 3:2016cv00423
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ricky Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TEJADA V. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. ET AL
as 1:2016cv01353
Defendant:
J & J MOORESVILLE DC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JONES PACKAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARCO TEJADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tejada v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Marco Tejada
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Jones Packaging, Inc. , J & J Mooresville DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starin Marketing, Inc. v. Swift Distribution, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Starin Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Swift Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Patricia Kar vs Swift Transportation at all
as 2:2015cv00383
Plaintiff:
Patricia Kar
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC , Mohave Trnasportation Ins Co , Red Rock Risk Management Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Steve Anderson
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC and Yunis A Awmaalim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
