Cases 31 - 40 of 315
(PC)Marsala v. Diaz et al
as 1:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Joseph August Marsala
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Kathleen Allison, Patrick Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Totua v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
Touta Touta and Totua Totua
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Grudino-Ruiz, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv04038
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
T. Allen and D. Brisht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Thomas v. T. Allen
as 2:2022cv04536
Petitioner:
Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Defendant:
Mark Inch, D.G. Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv03451
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
S. Gates, S. Sawyer, M. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Atenly et al
as 4:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Atenly, T. Allen, T. Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv02719
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
T. Allen, Atenley, Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Mazen v. T. Allen
as 2:2022cv03024
Petitioner:
Frank Mazen
Respondent:
T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woullard v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Woullard
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Allen, Col. Alvarez, Warden Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.