Cases 1 - 10 of 315
Hughes v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Hughes, Emily Crawford, Monique Danene Delgado and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
(PC) TerVeer v. Benavides et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
S. Benavides and T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) TerVeer v. Benavides et al
as 2:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
S. Benavides and T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duncan v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, The California Healthcare Recivership Corp, Christopher Ukiomogbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10612
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises, Revlon, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sateria T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
William James Knight v. T. Allen
as 2:2023cv03777
Petitioner:
William James Knight
Respondent:
T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Mosely et al
as 3:2023cv01857
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
Howard E. Mosely, Thitch, T. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv07229
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lakota v. Allen
as 3:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Danny Strongbear Lakota
Defendant:
Warden T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
