Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Reese v. Bowton et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff: Jonathan Roy Reese
Defendant: Joshua Bowton, Clay Dobson, Natalie Bealteu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Bybee et al
as 1:2021cv01368
Plaintiff: Darryl Chester
Defendant: Derrick Bybee, . Joachim, . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Osmundson et al
as 1:2021cv01345
Plaintiff: Shaquan Carter
Defendant: Kurt Osmundson, Dwayne Bernard, Graham Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foutch v. Bordner et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Plaintiff: Michael W Foutch
Defendant: Tracey Bordner, Unknown Officer #1, Unknown Officer #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv50198
Defendant: Tiffanie Clark
Plaintiff: CA Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MENDEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv04740
Defendant: LISA DURAND, TODD FAUBERT, C/O B. WILKINSON and others
Plaintiff: JULIO A. MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant: STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Perry v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv03185
Plaintiff: Darryl Perry
Defendant: John Baldwin, Kess Roberson, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becton et al v. WBY, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04003
Plaintiff: Latoya Becton , Latisha Blake , Shanetria Cameron and others
Defendant: WBY, Inc., Steven Youngelson, Surrey White and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?