Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Butler et al v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2019cv02171
Defendant:
Lonnie Oliver, Dorina Varner, J. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremey Melvin and Shariff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martz v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01965
Plaintiff:
Zachery Martz
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Supt. DelBalso and Tabb Bickell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Greg Johnson v. Darrell Wireman, et al
as 19-1968
Defendant / Appellee:
ULRICH KLEMM, DARRELL WIREMAN, SHAWN KEPHART and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG JOHNSON
SIMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01443
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE CURRIAN and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE LEE SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Michael Wenerowicz, Caleb Younker, Kenneth Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan White and Carlton Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02100
Plaintiff:
Abolitionist Law Center, Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project and others
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal, Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
Davon R. Hayes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
