Cases 31 - 40 of 299
Terrell v. Safety-Kleen Systems Inc
as 3:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Donald Terrell
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mickels v. Levys-Transport System et al
as 1:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Terrell E. Mickles
Defendant:
Levys-Transport System, Urban Communist Regime 5th and 11th Circuits, (1924) French Physicist-Louis De Brogile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Terrell Rayshawn Hughes
Defendant:
City of Dallas and Dallas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cline v. Inline Network Integration LLC
as 3:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cline
Defendant:
Inline Network Integration LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2022cv00291
Petitioner:
Tavori Terrell Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Peters v. John Doe
as 7:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
John Doe (7:22-CV-48-O), Bob Johnston, Sheriff Dept Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longwith et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv01478
Plaintiff:
Terrell Longwith and Annette K Longwith
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Terrell v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
John Ray Edward Terrell
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coker v. C.T. Agebole et al
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gary Coker
Defendant:
C.T. Terrell Unit, Sergeant Agebole, Officer Ageleti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
