Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Goodwin v. City of Texas City Texas
as 3:2014cv00090
Defendant:
City of Texas City Texas
Plaintiff:
William Goodwin , Darren Allen , John Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Thorne v Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, (METRO) et al
as 4:2013cv02997
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, (METRO) and Thomas C. Lambert
Plaintiff:
David L Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thorne v. Thaler
as 6:2013cv00035
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Michael Edwana Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neely et al v. Enerflow Industries, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Cathy Neely , Jeremiah Neely , Dale Johnston and others
Defendant:
Enerflow Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanford et al v. Thorn et al
as 3:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
George Sanford, III and Janice Hendley
Defendant:
John Thorn , Arthur Lee , Manual Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis et al v. MidFirst Bank
as 1:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
Gerald Francis and Debra R. Thorne Francis
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Thorne et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyds et al
as 1:2012cv00674
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and Ty Harlan Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Adell Thorne and Don Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Shackelford v. Thorne et al
as 1:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Phillip Allen Shackelford
Defendant:
Larry Thorne, Jefferson County and Attorney General Child Support
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Thorn et al
as 3:2012cv02035
Plaintiff:
Temeka Reece
Defendant:
Jeffery Thorn and City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
