Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02269
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02253
Petitioner:
Jameil L. Simpson
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03314
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Brandeshawn Harris, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03302
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Parsons
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, C. Mutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ishee et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont James and Terrance Lamount James
Respondent:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Stephen Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hendrick v. Ishee
as 1:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Chad Hendrick
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSBY v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00887
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA, TODD ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
