Cases 31 - 40 of 10,865
Armando Anaya-Jimenez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11415
Petitioner:
ARMANDO ANAYA-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S.P.S. OIG and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Texas v. Garland
as 24-10386
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Charlotte A. Burrows, in her official capacity as Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Jocelyn Samuels, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Brown v. Garland
as 24-60213
Petitioner:
Marvin Lloyd Brown
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Juan Ordonez-Castro, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3359
Petitioner:
JUAN ORDONEZ-CASTRO and LUCAS CORTEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jesus Rivera, et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 24-11311
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA, SIAKA MASSAQUOI, GREGORY PURDY, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DIRECTOR OF F.B. I., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Vasquez v. Garland
as 24-60210
Petitioner:
Samuel Vasquez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
