Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Murray v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2008cv05202
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Murray
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mohamed v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2008cv00895
Plaintiff:
Abdel Fattah Mohamed
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Fed Ex
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maccaro v. NYC Health and Hospital Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv05349
Plaintiff:
Michael Maccaro
Defendant:
NYC Health and Hospital Corp., Kings County Hospital, NYC Transit Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boice v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2007cv01088
Plaintiff:
Zeland S. Boice
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, National Bank Trust & Co. and Sean Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv07322
Plaintiff:
Wanda Perez
Defendant:
The United States of America, The U.S. Postal Service and Providencia Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Refund of penalty imposed by I.R.S.
Case name not on file
as 2:2007cv01721
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Bulova Corporation, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Colossal Carting Corp. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
BB & S Treated Lumber Corporation, Brown & Versaggi, Chesterfield Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maccaro v. NYC Health and Hospital Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael Maccaro
Defendant:
NYC Health and Hospital Corp., Kings County Hospital, NYC Transit Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
