Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv03011
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and David C Godbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 4:2019cv01618
Petitioner:
Terry Matthew Davis
Respondent:
United States District Court, Court of Criminal Appeals and Public of Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. United States District Court
as 3:2018cv03399
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Chief Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 4:2018cv03213
Plaintiff:
Michael Kennedy
Defendant:
All Judges US District Courts for Waco, TX, All United States District Court Judges, All Judges, US District Court, Northern District of TX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dallas County Insurance Company, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedillos-Alvarenga v. United States District Court
as 7:2017mc01465
Petitioner:
Maria Felix Cedillos-Alvarenga
Respondent:
United States District Court
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cesare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States District Court Eastern District of Texas
as 1:2017cv00268
Petitioner:
Shawn M. Johnson
Respondent:
United States District Court Eastern District of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
