Cases 31 - 40 of 394
Wright v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv01765
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wright
Defendant:
David Vaughn and Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Peterson v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Peterson
Defendant:
Sgt Vaughn, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Home Depot USA, Inc. a Georgia Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Vaughn
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. a Georgia Corporation and Stinchcomb Associates Inc., an Ohio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Baiocchi v. Hodges et al
as 3:2022cv50165
Plaintiff:
Steven Derik Baiocchi
Defendant:
Thomas Hodges, L. Vaughn, Susan Goral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn v. Segal et al
as 1:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Walter Vaughn
Defendant:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaughn v. Segal et al
as 1:2022cv02153
Petitioner:
Walter Vaughn
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Featherstun et al
as 1:2022cv01069
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L Williams
Defendant:
Sean Featherstun, Matt Vaughn, Jerry Crisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Vaughn
as 1:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stanley E Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
