Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Veasey v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Veasey, II
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stephens
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Chris Miller
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Austin Parker
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garzon v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Josh Garzon
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Turner Goodson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
John S. Smith
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crittenden v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Crittenden
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Donald Hill
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Brent Gill
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
