Cases 31 - 40 of 291
Asplundh v. Priority One Canine, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03359
Defendant:
Lori Morel, Priority One Canine, LLC and Wade Morel
Plaintiff:
Pamela Asplundh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. WADE et al
as 2:2020cv03280
Plaintiff:
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC, SAFFREN & WEINBERG, LLP, FELICIA WADE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
DERRICO v. SPRINGML, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02924
Defendant:
PRABHU M PALANISAMY, GIRISH JAM REDDY, SPRINGML, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELLEN DERRICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haight v. Harry et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow and others
Petitioner:
William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WADE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01793
Plaintiff:
MARY WADE
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. WADE et al
as 2:2020cv00179
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR CREDIT UNION and JEANETTE M. WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THORPE FAMILY TRUST et al v. KING et al
as 2:2019cv05932
Defendant:
DAVE KUHNS and UPPER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
THORPE FARM, KINGS GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC, KINGS FARM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COURTNEY et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv05395
Plaintiff:
WADE COURTNEY and MARY COURTNEY
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nottingham et al v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Respondent:
Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow, Anthony Ciuca and others
Petitioner:
James E. Nottingham and William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
