Cases 31 - 40 of 89
PURCELL et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05426
Plaintiff:
MARGARET PURCELL and DAVID D. PURCELL, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURCELL et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07041
Plaintiff:
MARGARET PURCELL and DAVID D. PURCELL, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. , BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURCELL v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2013cv03555
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE PURCELL
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRONSON v. DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI et al
as 3:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant:
DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI, MANDY VARNER and MARIA LEAHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Purcell v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Paul Frank Purcell
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dougherty v. Advanced Wings LLP et al
as 1:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Keith Dougherty
Defendant:
Advanced Wings LLP , Stratus Aviation LLC, Regis de Ramel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HARRIS v. DELANEY
as 2:2012cv05874
Petitioner:
PURCELLE HARRIS
Respondent:
JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In the Matter of Joseph M. Purcell to Perpetuate Testimony
as 3:2012cv01892
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of Joseph M. Purcell to Perpetuate Testimony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Purcell v. Ebbert
as 3:2012cv01246
Petitioner:
Paul Purcell
Respondent:
Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
