Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Wagner v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2017cv02617
Petitioner:
Lyle M. Wagner
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land, Clayton Smith, Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Whitson v. Wagner et al
as 3:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
James D. Whitson
Defendant:
Inice Wagner, DeVonte Jones and CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitson v. Jones
as 3:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
James D. Whitson
Defendant:
DeVonte Jones and Inice Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land , Clayton Smith , Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bain et al v. Progistic Carriers, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Roger Bain and Judy Bain
Defendant:
Progistic Carriers, L.L.C., Scott Wagner, Matthew Warren and others
Intervenor:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagner v. Anesthesia Services Associates, PLLC
as 3:2016cv02869
Plaintiff:
William Wagner
Defendant:
Anesthesia Services Associates, PLLC
Counter_plaintiff:
Anesthesia Services Associates, PLLC
Counter_defendant:
William Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amteck, LLC v. Lisin et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
Amteck, LLC
Defendant:
Nickolay Lisin and Ace Electric Company, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Tom TJ Jones
Counter_defendant:
David Wagner and Amteck, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Ace Electric Company, Inc. and Nickolay Lisin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coroama v. Roberts
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wagner Coroama
Defendant:
Gordon Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
