Cases 31 - 40 of 3,169
ROGERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2024cv01210
Petitioner:
LANCE ROGERS
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Okuo v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
as 3:2024cv01422
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Petitioner:
Mark Arome Okuo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renninger v. Greene
as 4:2024cv01425
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Renninger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
St. Remy v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Julien Michel St. Remy
Respondent:
Warden F. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01412
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Morgan v. Arviza et al
as 4:2024cv01420
Defendant:
Warden Arviza, Bizzlai, Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv01396
Petitioner:
Armando Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CLIFTON TERRELL CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Orton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01373
Petitioner:
Ryan Orton
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oladimeji v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01361
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Samuel Olaniyi Oladimeji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
