Cases 31 - 39 of 39
WILDER v. MEO et al
as 3:2015cv06502
Plaintiff:
SHAKEE WILDER
Defendant:
FRANCIS MEO, SHARAMLIE PERERA, ROBERT WOODWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER et al v. ROMA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv08123
Plaintiff:
BYATA WILDER , FRANK RIZZO and ELIO IPPOLITO
Defendant:
ROMA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. , ROMA OF NEW JERSEY , PERFORMANCE TRANSPORTATION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SKELCY v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC et al
as 3:2012cv01014
Plaintiff:
LINDA S SKELCY
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILDER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2010cv03428
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PELLER et al v. WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. et al
as 3:2009cv06481
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PELLER
Defendant:
WALT DISNEY WORLD CO., WALT DISNEY WORLD PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC., WALT DISNEY WORLD PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
WILDER v. TITTLE et al
as 2:2009cv02312
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WILDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL TITTLE, JANICE TITTLE and MONIQUE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
WILDER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
as 2:2009cv02311
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WILDER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILDER v. DMR TECHNICAL GROUP, et al
as 3:2002cv00879
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE V. WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
DMR TECHNICAL GROUP, AT&T, UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
