Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Travis v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00772
Petitioner:
Joe Lewis Travis
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. Strine et al
as 1:2011cv01015
Plaintiff:
Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc.
Defendant:
Leo E. Strine, Jr. , John W. Noble , Donald F. Parsons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Laster et al
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Smith and Helen S. Starchia
Defendant:
J. Travis Laster, Scott Dailey and Patricia A. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. US Marshal
as 1:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Stark et al
as 1:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Smith and Helen S. Starchia
Defendant:
Leonard P. Stark, Paul S. Diamond, William B. Chandler, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Biden
as 1:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bridgeforth v. Comcast Digital Cable Internet and Telephone Company et al
as 1:2010cv01042
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
Comcast Digital Cable Internet and Telephone Company, Joseph Fischer, Bridget - Operator ID: 5CS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00996
Plaintiff:
Edward Powell
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Paul Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
