Cases 31 - 40 of 200
Canada v. Olmsted County Community of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02120
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Olmsted County Community of Corrections, Dept of Corrections Commissioner, Hearing & Release Unit Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Stehr et al
as 0:2021cv02188
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Dan Stehr, Dan Sepeda, Damascus Way and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Antony et al
as 0:2021cv02204
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Mathias Antony, Olmsted Community of Corrections, Chad Mitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zongo v. Byers et al
as 0:2021cv01516
Defendant:
J. 6700 Anderson, L. 7294 Lockman, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Wendkouni Wilfried Arnold Zongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanhope et al v. Kokron et al
as 0:2021cv01263
Defendant:
Janet Kokron and Gary Kokron
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Wood Lasher and Jack Stanhope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halverson Wood Products, Inc. v. Classified Systems LLC
as 0:2020cv00801
Defendant:
Classified Systems LLC and Classified Systems LLC doing business as Hammerhead Attachments
Plaintiff:
Halverson Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Barham et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Darrell Walls, Jesus Gallego, Kevin Starin and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Hazel Hyleman, Sean Raskosky, Marcus Carter and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Wood v. Saul
as 0:2020cv02697
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02643
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hoehler, Pace Robin, William Pollard and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
