Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense
as 2:2018mc00008
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc, Preferred Law, PLLC and others
Receiver:
Thomas W McNamara
X v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00400
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
CLAUDE X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ECHOLS v. ROESSLER et al
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
CARL A. ECHOLS
Defendant:
C B. MIFFLIN, X ROESSLER and VRZINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Bryce et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Maureen O. Bryce and Charles Bryce
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Zimmer Biomet , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nicholson v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Molly Nicholson
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Does I through X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. WRIGHT et al
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
CORDON X BENNETT
Defendant:
BECCA GARDNER and RICHARD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
CORDON X BENNETT
Defendant:
CHAPMAN, RON GIBSON, HOLLOWAY and others
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
X.K.S.P. v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01831
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
X. K. S. P.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
