Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Wentworth et al v. NCHS Oceanside Health Center and Personnel
as 3:2021cv00756
Defendant:
NCHS Oceanside Health Center and Personnel
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wentworth and Yaw Appiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
In re Wentworth Civil Rights Cases
as 3:2021cv00757
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Dept & Personnel, CA State Board of Education & Personnel, State Board of Education & Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
Yaw Appiah, Journee Hudson and Dawn Wentworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Kershner v. Placer County, California et al
as 2:2017cv02312
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Kershner
Defendant:
Placer County, California , Devon Bell and Megan Yaws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershner v. Placer County et al
as 2:2017at01166
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Kershner
Defendant:
Placer County, Placer County Sheriff's Office, Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bangert v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2017cv01667
Plaintiff:
Beau Bangert
Defendant:
County of Placer , Placer County Sheriff's Office , Devon M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Placer County et al
as 2:2017at00770
Defendant:
Placer County, Devon Bell, Robert Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Placer County et al
as 2:2017cv01579
Defendant:
Placer County , Devon Bell , Robert Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02794
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chapman v. Bestland, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01206
Plaintiff:
Byron Chapman
Defendant:
Bestland, Inc., Kyung Ie Kim, Trustee of the Kyung Ie Kim living trust dated January 16, 2001 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
