Cases 31 - 40 of 16,540
Gill v. USA
as 2:2024cv11944
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sinnawi v. USA
as 2:2024cv11971
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael K Sinnawi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Kai Raymone Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gant v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00754
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eric Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McGuire v. H. George Levy, M.D., P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv11862
Defendant:
H. George Levy, M.D., P.C., Tru Dental Michigan, PC Doing business as Tru Family Dental - Temperance, H. George Levy and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis v. USA
as 2:2024cv11855
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffery Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santo v. Federal Reserve Bank et al
as 2:2024cv11842
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Reserve Bank
Plaintiff:
Paul Santo
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Van Geffery Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. USA
as 2:2024cv11835
Petitioner:
Diontae Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bible v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00725
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Treshawn Kalian Bible
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
