Cases 31 - 40 of 31,148
Carroll v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Candace Carroll
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zappone v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brittany Dawn Zappone
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Madden v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Monica L Madden
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Harper v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Julie K. Harper
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wolfe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Wolfe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Rau v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kayla Rau
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vojchehoske v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Steven Vojchehoske
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gibson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Albert Walter Gibson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Thomas
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
