Cases 41 - 50 of 323,528
Woytek v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Misty Woytek
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hooks v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Amira K Hooks
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
REICHBART v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
MARC REICHBART
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
GIAGNACOVA v. 21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
NANCY GIAGNACOVA
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL and Dr. Matthew Flannery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cordingley v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01847
Plaintiff:
Jason Cordingley
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WELSH v. PATEL et al
as 5:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
MELISSA WELSH
Defendant:
HETAL PATEL and JUHI K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Zahnee v. DONALDSON et al
as 2:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Edna Zahnee
Defendant:
RICHARD DONALDSON and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
