Cases 41 - 50 of 319
Applegate et al v. Robey
as 0:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Roy Applegate
Defendant:
Amy Robey and Heather McManis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shanks et al v. Rust et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Laura Shanks and Amy Downton
Defendant:
David Rust, Janis Winbigler, Amanda Donelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilbert v. Crews et al
as 3:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Chadwick A. Gilbert
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Amy Robey, Lindsey Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 015
Nelson v. Robey
as 5:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Jeth Nelson
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lauderdale v. Brady et al
as 4:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Lamone Lauderdale
Defendant:
Amy Brady, Colonel Hendricks, Quality Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dichiara v. Summit Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dr. Amy Dichiara
Defendant:
Summit Medical Group, Inc. doing business as St. Elizabeth Physicians, St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. doing business as St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Dr. Robert Prichard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dawn et al v. Muething et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Victor Dawn and Kathy Sue Dawn
Defendant:
Paul Muething, Paul Sylvester, Charles Luken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stull et al v. USA
as 5:2022cv00246
Executor:
Amy Stull and Brandon Stull
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
