Cases 41 - 50 of 344
Bey et al v. Chastek et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bey, Sonia Wooten and Kimberly Marion
Defendant:
Amy Chastek, Terisia Folaron and Dr Keith Posley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joski v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Amy Joski and Amy A Joski
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cox et al v. The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
John Cox and Sarah Dobrozsi
Defendant:
The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc., Childrens Hospital and Health System, Inc., Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scoon-Tachick v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Amy Scoon-Tachick
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Byline Bank v. Wings Air Helicopters LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Byline Bank
Defendant:
Wing Air Helicopters LLC, JAD Films, Inc., Javier V. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lugo v. Keith et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Richard Lugo
Defendant:
Amy L Keith, Stacy Pizur and Division of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vogt v. Vogt et al
as 2:2021cv01452
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Vogt
Defendant:
Donald H Vogt, Chase & Co, Amy Donaldson and others
Vogt v. Vogt et al
as 2:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Vogt
Defendant:
Donald Vogt, Terrence Bostic, JP Morgan Chase & Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. Town of Sugar Creek et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Plaintiff:
Karen A Babcock
Defendant:
Amy M Odette, Michael K Nelson, Mary Beth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
