Cases 41 - 50 of 202
Wright #110092 v. Pima, County of
as 4:2019cv00016
Respondent:
Pima, County of
Petitioner:
Arthur Cornell Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shivkov et al v. Artex Risk Solutions Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04514
Plaintiff:
Ingenuity Equity Group II LLC, Kristina Tsonev, UTA Holdings LLC and others
Defendant:
AmeRisk Consulting LLC, Jeremy Huish, Artex Risk Solutions Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kennedy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04188
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richie v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv03978
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles Ryan
Petitioner:
George Arthur Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carmona v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv03871
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Arthur Carmona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Austin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03455
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Arthur H Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv03416
Petitioner:
Arthur Black
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03081
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Collins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schluter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Joel Arthur Schluter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
