Cases 41 - 50 of 55
EPERT et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02570
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR RONALD EPERT and MELANIE S. EPERT
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
D'Amario v. USA
as 1:2008cv00338
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arthur D'Amario, 3rd
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
D'Amario, III v. Roy
as 1:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Edward C. Roy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02349
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Anderson, Albert E. Barnes, Michael Cardamone and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stuart v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02108
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Stuart
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Toegemann v. Guidance Associated, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Toegemann
Defendant:
Guidance Associated, Inc., Melvyn Johnson, M.D., Robert Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wiechering et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01943
Plaintiff:
Lora Wiechering, Arthur Halter, Jr., Tina Marie Glynn and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
National Electrical Contractors Association et al v. IBEW-Local 99, et al
as 1:2007cv00371
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Contractors Association, National Electrical Contractors Association, John Badessa and G. Thomas Chabot and others
Defendant:
IBEW-Local 99, IBEW-Local 99 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, IBEW-Local 99 Annuity Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lewis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01901
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Lewis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
