Cases 41 - 50 of 95,737
Wiseman v. USA
as 4:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Edward Wiseman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams et al v. Arlee Home Fashions, Inc.
as 6:2024cv03170
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams and Patricia Williams
Defendant:
Arlee Home Fashions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thurman v. Rug Doctor
as 4:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Thurman
Defendant:
Rug Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Pilger et al
as 4:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sarah Pilger and John Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Centene Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Centene Pharmacy Services, Inc.
Defendant:
CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. and CVS Caremark Part D Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
David James Milcendeau
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 4:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
bin Bey v. Gayden et al
as 4:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Dreke bin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Gayden and Cpt. Unknown Fowelkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
