Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Mueller v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv00632
Plaintiff: Kurt Mueller
Defendant: UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, Jonathan Jarvis, Karen Pittleman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Jarvis v. Wilson
as 2:2012cv00130
Plaintiff: Marlon Jarvis
Defendant: Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priddy v. Garman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00017
Defendant: Genny Bandy, John Garman and Larry W. Jarvis
Plaintiff: Joey Kenneth Priddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Jarvis
as 7:2011cv00296
Petitioner: Joseph Anthony Clayton
Respondent: Larry W. Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00441
Defendant: Dr. Battiata, Dr. Bishop, Ms. Bruce and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00411
Defendant: Dr. Battiata, Dr. Bishop, Ms. Bruce and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Jarvis et al
as 7:2010cv00280
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Hawkins
Defendant: Mr. Jarvis, Mr. Shelton and Gene Shinault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv00288
Plaintiff: Thomas Christopher Robinson
Defendant: Gene M. Johnson, Wendy Brown, Donna L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Burke et al
as 1:2010cv00640
Plaintiff: Daniel Lipscomb
Defendant: William Burke, Todd Trautner, Charles Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?