Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Hampton v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hampton
Defendant:
Claudia Harris, Asa Hutchinson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Payne
as 6:2021cv06113
Petitioner:
Jeffery W. Edwards
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Jackson and Jeffrey Jackson
Defendant:
Rickey Smith, Annette Clark, Christina Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Benny Magness, William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02012
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dale Williamson
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Medical Supervisor Christeena Ferguson and James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02002
Defendant:
Jail Administrator William (Bill) Dumas, Sheriff Hobe Runion and Medical Supervisor Christeena Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dale Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatley v. Marshall et al
as 3:2020cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Hatley
Defendant:
Regina Hindman and Trish Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Whisenhut et al
as 5:2020cv05226
Defendant:
Deputy Andrew Whisenhut, Deputy Jeffery Church, Deputy Joseph Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dewayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2020cv01405
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wright
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Does Jane and John, WellPath and Arkansas Division of Correction, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerardot v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gerardot
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group NV, Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
