Cases 41 - 50 of 3,689
Buster v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Douglas William Buster
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit, Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) and others
Defendant:
John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Enrique Colon and Toliver
Defendant:
Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huertas v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Branden Huertas and Semple
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. Toliver et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Easton
Defendant:
T Oliver, John Doe, Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruldock v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Brinsley Ruldock and Brinsley C. Ruldock
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matava v. Bureau of Federal Prisons
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
John E Matava
Respondent:
Bureau of Federal Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mustafa v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Wasim Mustafa
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
