Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Valente et al v. International Follies, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02477
Plaintiff:
Alison Valente , Jennifer Barlow , Kathryn Monroe and others
Defendant:
International Follies, Inc. and William Hagood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE V. MARKELY, et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
MELVIN LITTLE, JR
Defendant:
ROBERT MARKELY, JUSTIN HOOPER, HARVEY STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFUS v. HEAD et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant:
FREDERICK J HEAD, GEO GROUP INC, ALISON T BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lutz v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Alison Lutz
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Formby v. Polk County, Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Alison Formby
Defendant:
Polk County, Georgia, Polk County Board of Tax Assessors, James Tramell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. AINSLEY et al
as 3:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
GREGORY FRANKLIN DANIEL
Defendant:
ANDY AINSLEY, WILLIAM A PRIOR, JR, ROBERT MARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nally v. The Grand Jury of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv02663
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Nally
Defendant:
The Grand Jury of Bartow County, Georgia, Marie Wilson Williams, Jeffery C. Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Davis v. Markley et al
as 1:2013cv03999
Plaintiff:
Charles Allison Davis
Defendant:
Robert Markley, Michael Ghioto, Kevin Briskcoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
