Cases 41 - 50 of 231
HILL et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
DESTINY HILL, MARY JOHNSON, ASHLEIGH SANTIAGO and others
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Tresa Austin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PASKO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DAVID PASKO, LASHAWAN TOMPKINS, GRAYLON BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF VIGO COUNTY, BILL WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ECKES v. TROMLEY et al
as 1:2022cv02431
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN LEE ECKES
Defendant:
PARKER TROMLEY, MICHAEL KOLHOUSE, NOBLE PERISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUSTIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01958
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JONES v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN M. JONES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. USA
as 3:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
AUSTIN GIBBS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BRADY v. DJGN INDY, LLC d/b/a TONY'S OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Austin Brady
Defendant:
DJGN INDY, LLC d/b/a Tony's of Indianapolis
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2022cv01296
Petitioner:
AUSTIN B WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
AUSTIN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
HARROLD AUSTIN
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
