Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Coffey v. Ashwood Financial, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coffey
Defendant:
Ashwood Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coffey v. Louis and Associates, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coffey
Defendant:
Louis and Associates, Inc. and Geer Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coffey v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00252
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sonya G Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coffey v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2014cv00071
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlsey Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Betty Sue Coffey
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Betty Sue Coffey
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coffey v. Attorney General
as 1:2013cv00237
Petitioner:
Leslie D. Coffey
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffey v. Comprehensive Legal Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Coffey
Defendant:
Comprehensive Legal Solutions, Inc. and Brock & Scott, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Poore et al v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Poore, James Coffey, Michael Bigbee and others
Defendant:
William Holt, Tony Crawford, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency v Coffey
as 1:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Defendant:
Benjamin Scott Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
