Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. City of Rexburg, et al.
as 4:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ashtyn Whiting and Ashtyne Whiting
Defendant:
City of Rexburg, Rexburg Police Department, Shane Turman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Nichols and Daniel E. Nichols
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections /ISCI/ISCC, J. Christensen-Warden ISCC, Warden ISCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoddard, et al. v. Idaho State Penitentiary, et al.
as 1:2021cv00215
Defendant:
Idaho State Penitentiary and The Debi-Cake Program
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Stoddard and Gen. of Gangland (lockdown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Christensen
as 1:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Jay Christensen
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stoddard v. Harker et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Steven Harker and State of Idaho
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. John et al v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dawn Workman and Daniel St. John
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Shane Vrevich, Anthony Ghirarduzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Morris v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Possibly Canyon County Sherriffs, Brian Crawforth, Bailey Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
