Cases 41 - 50 of 770
Clark v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, County of Davidson, Eric Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cruter et al
as 3:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
Adam D. Cruter, Eric Jackson, Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Funk et al
as 3:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Eric O. Carter
Defendant:
Glenn Funk, Howard Gentry, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bing et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Eric Todd Jackson
Defendant:
Christy Arwood Bing, Edward E. DeWerff, John W. Carrey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00972
Petitioner:
Eric Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carter v. Holloway
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Eric O. Carter
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pendleton v. Beasley et al
as 3:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Marquica Beasley and B-Elite Real Estate Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Assault, Libel & Slander
Kyger v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Jacie Elizabeth Kyger
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv02384
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
