Cases 41 - 50 of 902
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Machorro et al v. Progressive Home Advantage
as 2:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Eric Machorro and Tamara Torres-Torres
Defendant:
Progressive Home Advantage underwritten by Homesite Insurance Company and Progressive Home Advantage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv05369
Plaintiff:
Carmen L Clark
Defendant:
Eric Young and Misty Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Douglass v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03052
Plaintiff:
Sean Eric Douglass
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jacobson v. Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05330
Petitioner:
Eric Jacobson
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange, Bob Ferguson and Kecia Rongen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Fishback et al
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Carla Newkirk
Defendant:
Robert Fishback, John Guy, Rhasha Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GS Holistic LLC v. Vape Savvy LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
Vape Savvy LLC doing business as Vape Savvy, Todd Wilson, Eric Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
