Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Little v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety Bureau of Narcotics et al
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Little
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety Bureau of Narcotics , City of Fulton, Mississippi , Reginald Reggie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis et al v. Meritor, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Felicia Willis , Viola P. Sykes , Emma J. Scott and others
Defendant:
Meritor, Inc. , Textron, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. Hodge et al
as 2:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Graham Cruise Williamson
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, David Hare, Jessie James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Reynolds American Inc.
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Little
Defendant:
Reynolds American Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moran v. E.M.C.F Medical Department et al
as 3:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Donald Moran
Defendant:
E.M.C.F Medical Department, Miss. Dept. of Corr. (MDOC), Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasper v. Abangan et al
as 3:2015cv00943
Plaintiff:
Oscar Glasper
Defendant:
Rolando Abangan and Ollie Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little Fish/Big Pond, L.L.C. v. C W Fin's LLC
as 3:2015cv00940
Plaintiff:
Little Fish/Big Pond, L.L.C.
Defendant:
C W Fin's LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Richards v. Abangan et al
as 3:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Roland Abangan, Unknown Little, Norris Hogans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Little et al
as 3:2015cv00517
Plaintiff:
Presley Meadows
Defendant:
Unknown Little, Unknown White, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Hogan et al
as 3:2015cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dukes
Defendant:
Norris Hogan, Rolando Abangan, Kevin Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
