Cases 41 - 50 of 29,056
Gabarrete-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3723
Petitioner:
ERLIN MARILIN GABARRETE-LOPEZ, GENESIS NICOLLE VALLECILLO-GABARRETE and MARILIN FERNANDA VALLECILLO-GABARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon Lopez, et al. v. Sunset Housing Solutions L.P.
as 24-3718
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, File on Demand No Attorney for Corporation and STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC
Defendant:
SUNSET HOUSING SOLUTIONS L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Calderon Lopez v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transport Authority, et al.
as 24-3717
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY and CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Hernandez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3725
Petitioner:
ERNESTO HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ and AURA ALICIA SANCHEZ ALDANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
5th St Loft LLC v. George R. Lopez et al
as 2:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
5th St Loft LLC
Defendant:
George R Lopez, Heather Carrie and Does 1 to 10
Lopez et al v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04977
Plaintiff:
Gladis Lopez, Leslie Chavez, Jamie Chavez and others
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Management Corporation and Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Rafel Rogers
Defendant:
Luis Efren Ramos, Jr. and Bernardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faouzi Jaber v. W. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11970
Plaintiff:
FAOUZI ABDUL-MENHEM JABER
Defendant:
W. RODRIGUEZ, A. CHRISTIAN, FNU LOPEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
