Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Collins v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv01925
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Collins
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2012cv00666
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Collins
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20797
Plaintiff:
Adriene Oliver and Lorenzo Oliver
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolliver et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Tolliver and Francis Tolliver
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spingola v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20298
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Spingola
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 1:2012cv00202
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harrison
Respondent:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Gregg et al
as 1:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Harrison
Defendant:
William Gregg, John Buckhalter, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen et al v. Reid et al
as 1:2010cv02790
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Thigpen, Donte Booker and Terry Crim
Defendant:
Bob Reid, Warden Ivy and Cuyahoga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Mason
as 1:2010cv02660
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo J. Thigpen
Defendant:
Bill Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen et al v. Reid et al
as 1:2010cv02260
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo J. Thigpen, Donte Booker and LaShawn Wells
Defendant:
Bob Reid and Cuyahoga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
