Cases 41 - 50 of 158
Mershon v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50236
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Mershon
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hubbert v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2023cv50225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hubbert
Defendant:
Rob Jefferies, Tarry Williams, Dr. Zok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goings v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Frederick Goings
Defendant:
Scott S. Nodine, T. Woodcock, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09457
Plaintiff:
MERSHON POPE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NAYLOR v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARGO v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
WILLIE PARGO
Defendant:
DAUSS, DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. BAGIENSKI et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Defendant:
MISSY BAGIENSKI, LISA HAMBLEN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JACKSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REAGLE, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. MERSHON et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HOWARD
Defendant:
JOHN L. MERSHON, M. BAGIENSKI, CENTURION MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GATLIN v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
JERELLE GATLIN
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, DENNIS REAGLE, JOHN MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
